Could We Ever See Sovrumano Become a Freemason??!

You know I don’t bend that way–however–with so many people now on the side of the police-state and with so many people being betrayed and with so many keeping myum about it–perhaps you can’t help but wonder what you should do if presented with the opportunity to defect. And of course this doesn’t just apply to the police state, it applies to all sorts of dillemnas. So for this article, we cover a few decision making strategies to help you think clearly–logically and morally.

It has been said that because of warfare that man had to learn math. I don’t know if that’s true or not but math certainly applies.

So without any further ado, I will give you a few examples that you can apply to numerous scenarios.

The Prisoner’s Dillema

I have long prided Myself on not teaching this. Why? Because it’s a staple in game theory courses and philosophy and ethics as well. If you go to University, you are bound to run into it.

The way it goes is this, you and a friend are busted stealing out of a warehouse. Officers have you back at the station and are interrogating you. But the two of you are not cooperating. You are both looking at jail time–about 20 years each.

Flustered, the police decide to separate you and give you the skinny:

If you both stay silent as you are doing, you will each get 10 years in prison.

But if you help police and your friend continues his silence, he will get 30 years and you can go free.

If you both fink on each other you will both get 20 years.

Wow. Stakes are high. Your mind races.

Now the answer here mathematically is twofold and taken from two perspectives. The first is individual rational choice. That means selfishness has the least consequences given the way the deal is structured.

However, there’s no way to know what your friend is doing in the next room.

The collectively rational choice is to cooperate or stay with what you were doing which is to remain silent and get the least punishment which is 10 years.

Now when you put this question to University students they will immediately begin to argue with each other and that is why the scenario is a famous one taught all over the world. But I personally don’t like it and I’ll tell you why. Afterwards you probably won’t like My explanation but it’s justified.

“You cannot be a good intelligence agent if you are not a good psychologistst.”

-Sovrumano

By the way, in fairness to the puzzle given, I would recommend that you give it it’s due and really expend some time on the idea. Sketch out or make a chart of the contingencies given so that you are not just zipping through it but can really feel the problem and stakes at play.

That said, I will tell you what My issues are with the puzzle and why students will always argue over it.

First, you need to know your friend. Something that the example doesn’t account for. What kind of person is he? Is he the kind who would rat on you? Is he really loyal or really analytical? Does he intimidate easily? Knowing these things will help you decide what to do. Without it, you are simply gambling with odds that are 1/3 with varying consequences.

The option to go free isn’t free.

Huh? Well, if it was then we wouldn’t have a dilemma would we? Think about it and what was accidentally implied. This is an area where I excel by the way. Listen for what was not said but accidentally implied. You can go free but your buddy gets–what? THIRTY YEARS? Do you see why this is a dilemma? It’s because you feel the pain of your friend in jail for the next 30 years. But we are not done yet.

In real world scenarios you have friends and you have neighborhoods and you have reputations. If you live in the kind of environment where word will get around that you have finked on your friend and got to walk away free and that is something that they will have a problem with–then you know that you are still alive and breathing in jail with your friend. Which is preferable to finding yourself floating face-down in a river somewhere, right?

That is called Situational Awareness and that’s something that we talk a lot about here.

If you know your friend is amoral or weak both of which could make him crack and rat you out then you don’t dare stay silent.

If he’s the loyal or strong or obnoxious type then you know he’s keeping his mouth shut in there. Besides you two made a pact before you got into this game, right?

But if your friend is a piece of shit who dragged you into this against your will and you have no other people who know of him or what you two did tonight, then you could place the blame on him and take off.

That is how you make the decision. To eliminate the psychological dimension from the problem will keep you in a mathematical quandary for the next 100 years. 

No thank you.

 

Tit for Tat

Tit for tat is a strategy whereby you return what is given to you.

If you cooperate unless betrayed, this can outperform betrayal in the long run since you are matching their betrayals with your own. And this is something I advocate in the forbidden realms and subjects of torture.

Torture is a subject that is off-limits to neophytes and is seldom brought up in classes or pop radio/podcasts, etc. and for good reason–they don’t want it on your mind as an option.

However it comes up in My life. A lot. I Am constantly tortured by our own police and it is done so on a daily basis. My father was tortured his whole life unbeknownst to Me until recently. He was actually tortured in the hospital at the age of 67 or so. After spending his whole life with just one moveable arm and leg and being able to get around like that, he did so as one of Jehovah’s Witnesses and bravely went door-to-door preaching God’s word to whomever would listen and he offered free home Bible studies to those who did at his own expense. He did this for over 40 years and was a devout believer.

No matter.

Israel has a thing against Christians, that’s why they created them. So they could pummel them for it down the road; ruin the Church and the loyalty and respect it deserves with this last generation here that continues to show up for services while simultaneously trying to wreck it from the inside.

This is where I come in.

If I were given the option to torture in return, should I do so?

Now people who shriek at the idea of anyone being tortured (and rightly so) demand that any pretense to a debt owed in torture be dropped immediately.

But others don’t. Although the stakes are the highest they could possibly be, they believe that returning to the enemy what they dish out to be the correct thing to do even if that is torture.

So what do you think?

Here are some things to think about:

Math shows that betrayal only makes sense if you will not interact with the person again. Churn ’em and burn ’em.

Or perhaps you value your immediate gains more than your future relationship.

Full STOP.

Reread that last paragraph for Me.

Bingo.

Another example I can give you is the people who betray Christ for the Freemasons. Some of them African American people. Why would African people betray Christ for someone who has abused them for the last 500 years?

Well, there’s a couple of reasons but let Me be frank with you on the first one as I’ve said it before and it’s bound to offend some:

A subset of the African race that I call “blacks” are just dumb. And they betray not because they are clever but because they don’t see the long term consequences to their actions.

The second reason for betrayal by African people to Christ is because they think, or they are gambling, that they can have their cake and eat it too. They can burn Christ, sell Him to the Freemasons or participate in handicapping Him and STILL show up for services with no one doing anything about it. So they get paid from Freemasons and they lose no benefits from the Church. Morals aside, this makes mathematical sense.

Lastly, you have those who value immediate money or benefits (like psychotronics) over long-term benefits or unrealized gains. Cash now is tangible. Everlasting freedom is not. And he ain’t sure you gonna pull that one off  ‘neder. So what you gonna do? “Go on and take the money and run.” as the song says, that’s what they do.

As long as police are controlling everyone by putting a gun to their head then what the blacks see is opportunity to show moxy in the face of Christ while He is without retinue or wealth or power. It never occurs to them that they were supposed to be the source of these things–to the death,  just out of gratitude for having every member of their families saved for the last 500 years or perhaps it never occured to them that Christ is the literal owner of their lives since the Church is the one that paid for them or since they were dedicated to it by baptism or conscientious membership–the point here being that with police declaring an “ownership” of everyone and their property while the Church is the one who pays for them, the police will pull of a heist with the help of these black people who are solely the property of the Church.

Finally I would say to use caution when using categories. Not all Africans are the same and not all blacks, either. What do I mean by that?

I was thinking about betrayal one day and in the 80’s a cry went out from many African American leaders like Al Sharpton or perhaps Jesse Jackson about black on black crime in the ghetto.

Now I was thinking about how we are increasingly seeing more and more people who support Israel by way of Freemasonry. In fact if there is a real displacement occuring then at the end of it you would only see people alive who are in support of israel in this country, right?

So it’s obvious that if there is black on black crime and after a few more iterations you see a bunch of blacks still alive who “incidentally” support Freemasonry by having security guard cards or deputizations by the Sheriff’s (a haven for Crips, btw. And that word “Crip” is tied to Israel, I believe.).

So why is it that young people today are suddenly spitting vitriol at Christ as He walks the streets whereas five years ago the coolest news on the radar was that Christ was here in Los Angeles? It’s because police decided that they wanted to attempt to steal My publishing opportunities. That is the only reason.

The rest is brainwashing.

I have a kid fly past Me on a bike and say, “Get cancer.” And I retort, “Why?” And to this day not a single kid can explain himself. That’s because the idea is not his own and he doesn’t know why he has it either. But he does know this: If he betrays Me for the police, police are offering psychotronics and that in turn gives one the ability to read minds, tactile sensations, ecstasy stronger than the street drug on tap, remote viewing, and it goes on and on. And for that–they will cut Me and run as fast as they can run. Ask Me how I know.

Okay, got it? Immediate gains over long term benefits, and, You’re never gonna see this guy again. I told you I teach vice. Okay let’s move on.

 

If the last section was a little heavy, we’re going to lighten it up with a little cinema and a de facto guest teacher. Well, he’s not affiliated with us in any way but he put a good videocast on The Pirate’s Game up on YouTube and it utilizes The Dark Night movie, too!

So let’s take a look:

There’s a part two…

 

And a part 3…

 

In My opinion the first video is the best and this will conclude Part One of “Will We Ever See Sovrumano Become a Freemason??!’

I hope you have enjoyed it and I look forward to posting the second part next week.

-Sovrumano

 

🌑

Copyright 2025 Sovrumano All Rights Reserved

This site is the exclusive property of Christ Titus Anderson and Sovrumano.

Christ Titus and Sovrumano have no partners, representatives, co-owners or managers. Any pretense to such a role with this company or it’s properties is fraudulent.


error: Content is protected, please.