“Do What Thou Wilt”

White supremacy is a relatively new coining of an idea that was hatched, I believe, about 1000 years ago by ancient Israelites.

As you may know from previous postings I believe that the exit from Hammurabi’s farm which was had a Hindiu/Buddhist sociology about it, is where we get most of the tenets for today’s White Supremacy as espoused by white supremacists.

To simplify, they are past “pain points” and the tenets are simply aversions to them. I have listed all of those I thought were derivatives elsewhere and there arre about 8 of them that I know of.

But let’s take one of them for this article: “We’ll never take orders fr5om anyone else again.” And/or “From now on, we’ll be the ones who give the orders no matter what.”

Hammurabi is storified as Moses in the Old Testament, in case you are unfamiliar with the lore here. Moses, on his way back from a meeting with God, has the 10 Commandments (originally 9) and is ready to share them with the Israelites who he has hired as slaves. To his consternation he finds them in the middle of one of their dances and rituals for Ba’al, the fertility deity. Today often equated with Satanism.

And at this site and in his frustration, he throws down the tablets onto the ground where they are broken into pieces now. He orders the Israelites out and off of his property come what may and the Israelites leave him for the desert.

Now what really happened, I believe, is that Hammurabi’s rules–of which there is still preserved record of today–were obviously too cumbersome for 1. People of such age. 2. For sake of their being African and their inherent traits. 3. They were likely lifelong Ba’al-ists and therefore unlikely to convert. And they hated the rules. “Smile on your brother.” And “Do no harm to anyone.” There were hundreds of these things.

ANYWAY, I believe that the “exit” wasn’t as conveniently performed as the scriptures glibly articulated it. I imagine that to move that many African people of grown age out of their abodes and into the desert took some doing. And that there were likely many words exchanged between the Israelites and Hammurabi on their way out the door, so to speak. But that is another post for another time.

Once in the desert, finding themselves too cold or too hot, and without the former comforts they once enjoyed, they now began to look for reasons why this happened and why it must never happen again. Israelites were facing starvation if they didn’t figure something out and, I believe, it is likely that they had to engage in cannibalism to survive. I suppose at times that today’s contemporary notion of “sacrifices” for their uprising is nothing more than wordplay on what they had to do for themselves to make it out as a culture of -people.

Now then, We shall be on top from now on. Or, we’ll be the one to give the rules. I suspect that this idea has morphed into it’s supposed equivalent in “Born free.’ or “Freemason” or a “Free man”. After all, there were slaves and there were also not slaves. But upon reflecting on this I uncovered something.
Think about it--what differentiates a slave of the 1700’s from a free man of the same age? Think. It’s very simple and we all have them today…

Civil rights. That is all.

With civil rights, no one can tell you to have children or walk into your home and declare anything you own something that they own by extension. You could represeent yourself in court now or go vote for what you wanted or didn’t want to happen.

Now remember, the original reasons for the dictum “We’ll always be the ones who tell others what to do from now on.” has been forgotten if it were known at all by today’s supremacists. I don’t believe it was. Therefore we have the impulse and indoctrination both overt and covert to see ourselves as the ones in society who will be the superior ones or the upper classmen (likely based on Hindu ideas of a Brahmin upper class) relative to anyone else’s stature but without knowing why I should. This is something that the KKK and other supremacists groups literally go to war for.

This dictum.

But there are several problems and you can tell that the idea was created by someone who is, despite all good intentions, not a professional policy maker or lawyer.

Scenario One: There are 900M Mexicans. They have IQ’s that range from 90-134. Okay? This is an example. Now, there are 900M whites and they have IQ’s ranging from 90-140. Okay? Now you tell Me what happens when you try to move 900M mexicans into positions where individuals have IQ’s as high 132 would be subject to someone who is white with an IQ of 90 points? You can’t. And you don’t try it either.

But today’s clanmen mistakenly do just that. In fact, if you are “too” good looking for them, they will literally punch you in the face and scold the girls for finding you attractive. Ask Me how I know.

And the punching doesn’t stop there, either. There’s discrimminationa and blah, blah blah….s that happen as well.

Next, the requisite intelligence.

Slaves were not allowed to go to school or learn English at one time, do you remember the stories from your history books? This likely another extreme example of staying on top so as to give the orders. You don’t want someone comparably intelligent to yourself. He’s a threat.
But digging a bit further we see that at one time slaves were dependant upon the master to tell them which way to go to get to downtown. Or how to read a map, I should say. Or how to write down the items needed from the store, and so on. Today, Israel has supposedly spouted some words that annoyed Me. They were supposedly addressing a crowd of young men and women in Africa and said, “The nonwhite races could be of some use to the whites; they could assist us in our endeavors.” or something like that.

I have also heard from other supremacists that they were somewhat justified in their posturing for surely, the brown races needed them to be there to direct them in their affairs.

This is true if your talking advanced sciences but false if you are talking sociology. And today’s supremacists mistakenly try to apply it to sociology or the goings-on of the citizen. For their–the clan’s–own good.

Fact is, Maria–who spends 8 hours a day vacuuming the rooms at the Ramada Inn–is in no need whatsoever for a slave-keeper. She gets around just fine. She files her own taxes and uses Google Maps when she’s lost. She even compiled her own job history and resume and applied for her job online. She has a small apartment. She’s set.

Where is the role for the slave-keeper who would designate all brown folk from South of the border his personal property? There isn’t one. But that doesn’t stop the police-cults from their attempts to bring slavery back.

And why the hell are we bringing the horrors of slavery back? It’s not just so you can act out the scene envisioned by your forefathers, is it?

Should we redefine free man as one who not only has civil rights but the freedom to invade your privacy or assume control of your property or family?

And the reasons for this are gruesome. Absent any farmwork or necessity lest we all starve to death this winter–what you have is utility of other people for the purposes of self-aggrandizement. Look at me. Look at me relative to you! And then we have the primary reason. Money.

And supremacy is not “superiority”. Supremacy is a position. Although ancient Israelites who wanted to be on top of others irrespective of merit for fear of being abused again did not coin the term, that is the effect of their improvised policy to alay it–supremacy (not superiority) over others.

Today’s “slavery” is nothing more than a declaration of control over another human being such that to take or utilize anything they might have–from their daughters to files on a thumb drive–are by extension the property of the state, your new controller. And he just happens to be the state’s agent. Conveniently.

So skimming is the motive. The ability to take life-force from another entity and utilize it for oneself. In extremes, I have called this orientation the Downward Facing Man in another post.

Downward Facing because he looks primarily at others as someone he could use or take something from when contemplating how to get what he wants vs. thinking of ways to earn what he wants.

The black peoples of Africa have a long history of this. Vampires don’t come from Transylvania, they come from Africa. For centuries, African bushmen and farmers have poked goats and cows in the throat with a sharp instrument and drinken blood directly from the animal’s throat.
There are also child sacrifices, human sacrifices, the raiding and marauding of others right down to today’s contemporary black person who is on welfare but has no business being on it. There are black police officers who use their jobs to police what is happening in social circles that they frequent or envy or want ready for the moment that they are ready to blow their own cover and join the party.

Now then, “Do What Thou Wilt”.

The quip is from Aleister Crowley, an occultist and satanist and Freemason.

Crowley, who was Cambridge educated, born in the 1870’s and set records as a rock climber, was likely quoting advanced teachers in philosophy if he were not reformulating the “We’ll never take orders from anyone else.” dictums. As I have said, the ghist of these orders continues throughout trime but the original reasons they were made to begin with have been lost. And it is crucial to umderstand why and how they came about instead of blindly following the ghist of the orders. Doing so has created terrible problems and unnecessary ones as well in our present age.

IF you were determined to continue to enjoy this top spot that always gives the orders for the purposes of not organization but for sake of self-aggrandizement–what would you think or say if you suddenly found yourself living in today’s contemporary world where everyone has civil rights?

It’s a problem, isn’t it?

All of us on equal ground…

But you want and need your distinguished position! Your ancestors didn’t seize this land so you could disappear into the quicksand. No, you were borne to rule!

So what to do?

Think about that for a second and I’ll show you what’s going on in the id of the individual who unconsciously pursues these goals without knowing why.

What you would begin to subconsciously do is look for ways to pull away from the citizen.

How could one do that? You slowly erode away their civil rights. Give them allowances. Tell them what they are allowed to do per yourself not the statutes.
Second, you would give yourself more latitude. But how does one do that if we already have civil rights?

Very simply, you give yourself permissions beyond the personal self and begin to invade the affairs of those around you. Effectively policing their personal lives and “who likes who” around here, and How does he make so much money? And, I think I’ll look over this guy’s shoulder to see how he does what he does.

But it gets worse, not better, mind you. Today’s tech has given police the ability to read minds, to assault, to murder, to force flatulence or stools out of your rectum as well as the ability to stimulate or create passions that make the street drug ecstacy look and feel inferior by some 300%.

The tech is illegal but that doesn’t stop it’s wide-spread use. Just turning the damn thing on makes one a terrorist. You can’t read your neighbor’s mind without his suffering a loss. And yet it is doled out like candy to whites and others without any regard to need or qualification for having such an ability.

You could use the tech to wipe all crime right off the planet but instead it’s used to feed off of others and their goings-on. Any ideas who and where it might be coming from? Good. I’m not allowed to use that kind of language even on My own platform very often.

So we have the degeneration of your civil rights while white males clamor for jobs with deputizations and tech that will enable them to have more latitude them the average citizen. Who needs a PhD when you can just control them?

And that My friends, was My rant on “Do What Thou Wilt” and it’s sophomoric beginning. Kudos to ancient Israelites for their resolve to never suffer another blow or mistreatment (although by all accounts the mistreatment of slaves by Israel is horrific compared to anything they themselves suffered by Hammurabi) and although the dictum was good of intent, it was poor of formulation. And for this reason needs to be redressed so that the harm it creates is eradicated.

🌑

There will be another post on the reformulation or motives behind the directives given, perhaps. But as a quick example—we know that the “Never take orders from anyone except ourselves.” was for sake of a bad experience with a foreigner as ruler. (Nevermind what Israel has become to so many countries as she assumes her will over the land. Ugh.) But this is relieved another way: Background checks. Resumes. For recourse you have the Labor Boards and other unions and EOE and employee rights. You see? Problem solved.